Prosperity Love
February 13th, 2010 | by admin |
With record amounts of snow shutting down the Federal Government, we explore the impact of the EPA’s radical global warming agenda.
Learn more at http://americansforprosperity.org
Duration : 0:1:48
With record amounts of snow shutting down the Federal Government, we explore the impact of the EPA’s radical global warming agenda.
Learn more at http://americansforprosperity.org
Duration : 0:1:48
25 Responses to “Prosperity Love”
By gunth54332 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Best line I’ve …
Best line I’ve heard…..”These environmental whackos are watermelons……Green on the outside but definitely red on the inside……….
By fucklife247 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
this is stupid
this is stupid
By miccohargo on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
want a better world …
want a better world? kill all whacko environmentalists
By DogLeroy on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
The bottom line is …
The bottom line is this: We Humans have no power to effect the planet’s weather patterns, for better or for worse. To think otherwise is sheer asininity.
By GanguGengu on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
#mikeW1571
There …
#mikeW1571
There is no studies showing that “weather patterns have became more unpredictable then they have been in the past.”
“Whether or not the the earths temperature is rising is not up for debate”, bullshit, huge majority of global warming denialers argue exactly that.
By JayDOgden on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Stupid video.
Stupid video.
By mikeW1571 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
The snow actually …
The snow actually helps to support “global warming” and a the occurrence of climate change. The increase in water vapor due to melting ice caps has caused weather patterns to become, at the very least more unpredictable then they have been in the past. Whether or not the the earths temperature is rising is not up for debate, whether it is being caused by man or not is. Even, with that issue all evidence points to one side, while the corporations and their lobbying money point the in the other.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
If global warming …
If global warming has started, we must first understand the local effects that global warming has on each part of the planet before humanity develops ways to mitigate the effects of global warming.
In conclusion “record amounts of snow” as the OP describes does nothing to help his point.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
That is why the …
That is why the phrase “global warming” is a misnomer and misleading.
For certain, global warming is a natural cyclical occurrence in Earths history that is destined to happen again. On the other hand, it is currently debatable if global warming is occurring now.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Even though it is …
Even though it is true that the average temperature for the entire planet will also increase, it is misleading to imply that the average temperature everywhere will increase too.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
For instance, …
For instance, certain areas will become much drier or wetter than their current norm. Also, hurricane and typhoons will become more common and more violent. Artic blasts and blizzards will also increase in frequency and intensity.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Unfortunately, the …
Unfortunately, the phrase “global warming” is often understood as the average temperature everywhere on Earth will increase. In actuality, most areas of the planet will go through an average increase in temperate, yet some parts of the planet will suffer an average decrease in temperature. This is because as more heat or energy is trapped in Earths atmosphere, this will cause more erratic temperatures and extreme weather phenomena.
By sdafdsfsdfdsfsdf on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
sigh. Global …
sigh. Global Warming is a Misnomer
Whether global warming is real or not, the phrase “global warming” is quite misleading. Global warming actually means the average surface temperature of the entire planet increases because of mankinds actions and/or the natural changes to the environment.
By Happyanand69 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Wait a minute… …
Wait a minute… It’s snowing in the US so that means that there is no global warming?
Wait for it…
AAAahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa
By pinochet222 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Repulican ideology, …
Repulican ideology, dude
By Danold31wa on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
MUST READ OUT LOUD! …
MUST READ OUT LOUD!!! FOR THIS EXPIRIMENT TO WORK:in one of the deadlydisease7s videos a guy says thers a bushle he played it backwards and we said sad santan now that you have read this out loud you will be sad and die in 24 hours unless you repost this to 3 other videos plzzz warn them about this
By harrygabc123 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Google “dust bowl” …
Google “dust bowl” this is a fascinating, although a tragic event in American history. It is one of many events that disproves global warming.
I remember when Carter was pres. they were saying we were heading into an “ICE AGE”. TRUTH is the sun’s activity on it’s surface causes our climate fluctuations. Don’t tell the LIB-NUTS, they will try to tax US taxes for the SUN!!
By harrygabc123 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Wonder if Al Gook …
Wonder if Al Gook has heard about the “dust bowl” of the 1930′s that lasted almost 10 years? He probably would pull the rest of his hair out. It was a period of drought in the plains of the mid-west America. That killed thousand’s of people. The dust clouds reduced visibility to nearly zero and covered a large portion of the country, with rolling clouds of “black death” reaching as far east as NYC & Wash. DC. Humans didn’t stop the rain that caused it, so what would these NUTS say about this?
By Bamlio on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Thanks AFP and Tim …
Thanks AFP and Tim Phillips for a excellent video on Global Warming…NOT!
Has Al Gore come out of hiding yet?
By msandavis on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
look at the sources …
look at the sources. what is blog heritage? spin spin spin
By Kimminata on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
How will EPA …
How will EPA regulate C02 under Clean Air Act? CAA: emissions must be measured from the point source using instruments, not guestimates;chemical release must have a direct and immediate impact; the point source has financially feasible technological options 4 reducing emmisions that don’t bankrupt them bread company, dry cleaners etc. EPA: explain how co2 meets CAA rqmts. Sad thing is cchange crap takes away from real environ problems that can kill now. Like ecoli in bad drinking water.
By buster757 on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
people who believe …
people who believe in man made global warming also believe in the Easter Bunny!
Where is all the concern when Al Gore flies all over the world in his own Gulfstream V jet all by himself. Can you say hypocrisy?
By 50sMusicMan on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Just got February’s …
Just got February’s copy of the “Smithsonian” magazine in the mail and found a few interesting facts: 1) The Sahara Desert went from dry to rolling grassland when the monsoons moved north (8500 BC) 2) People settled the region about 7000 BC 3) The “green” Sahara reverted to desert between 3500 to 1500 BC. I wonder where the hated coal-firing factories that made the stone tools went to?
By sealginco on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
Good point GueGreen …
Good point GueGreen.
But then, what kind of idiocy founds policy on a scam that has little-and-disappearing-credibility?
Perhaps ecowhaco lemmings who can’t spell science?
Perhaps academic parasites who milk this cow for billions in wasted grant $ ?
Perhaps power-hungry politicians who see an opportunity to herd the lemmings?
Perhaps all the above ..but no one who can actually reason?
By guegreen on Feb 13, 2010 | Reply
What kind of idiocy …
What kind of idiocy founds policy upon an inability to understand the distinction between climate and weather?